Back to it..

Hey folks,

Been a long time since I’ve been back here but it’s certainly weird to look over some of my old revision. I’ve switched over to a degree in History which i will be starting in September. As this website has always been a tool for me to further revise through presenting all my notes in I can only hope is a somewhat professional manner. Given how much doing so has helped me in the past (and I sincerely hope has helped you all too) I’ll continue using this ‘MasterYourStudies’ format in order to focus on and present my history studies. Starting off I shall be delving into the European period of 1850-1914, the progress made during this time etc. etc. 🙂 Hopefully I’ll have my first post up within a few days.

Cheers guys,



PSYCH 5: Piaget’s theories of Cognitive development

 Cognitive Development

Piaget’s theory of cognitive development:

His early work:

Piaget started working under Binet, studying how to identify children with special learning needs. Their method included asking children questions that got progressively harder, they would link the levels of difficulty of these questions with different age boundaries. The child’s mental age would be associated with the answers they got correct on a particular level of difficulty. This is how most intelligence testing is done today

Piaget was not interested in why the children got these answers wrong, but why they tend to get the answers wrong in the same manner. Their answers may have been incorrect, but from a child’s point of view they could sometimes make sense. Piaget theorised that children are not mini adults (as previously established in the 19th Century) but completely different thinkers, both quantitatively and qualitatively. 

Piaget established 5 key principles: 

  1. Constructivism – Children take an active role in their own development, (they construct themselves) pretending to be explorers or scientists as they learn about the world around them. 
  1. Children think qualitatively in a very different manner from us, they will even make very different assumptions about the world from us. 
  1. Structuralism – A schema is a cognitive structure. It can be defined as an organised set of knowledge. Schemas are how we respond to situations. At an early age they are simple reflexes e.g. sucking. Schemas become more complex as we get older. These will change/accomodate to knowledge we gain as we get older. 
  1. Biological basis development is innate, it begins with simple reflexes and these are the building blocks that help us move forward of the adaption process. This is what leads to our more complex actions.
  1. Intelligences is adaptive. This is all about how children will change their schemas alongside their ever-changing environment. Adaption is a two part process, first the children assimilate new information, then their schemas will accommodate the new information in order for them to adapt to the new situation.

-When a child encounters something that they have not yet accommodated to, they are at a point of disequilibrium, this is what encourages the accommodation and adaptation which will leave them in a state of equilibrium.

e.g. When a child encounters new information or a new experience such as seeing a horse for the first time after being used to dogs and primarily categorising dogs as four legged animals, making them classify a horse as a large dog. When told otherwise this knowledge will not fit into any pre-existing schemas they have, putting them in a state of disequilibrium. They will then accommodate this new information (dogs are not the only animals with four legs and a tail, horses are like large dogs). This new categorisation is still incredibly basic but will inevitably undergo many many repetitions of this same process.

Sequence of progression:

Piaget proposed a number of separate stages leading to the final development of ‘formal operational thought. Piaget claimed that the sequences was not going to change and that everyone would always go through them in the given particular order. Piaget also claimed that the following stages were biologically predetermined.

Sensorimotor Stage (0-2 years):

An infant will deal with the world using solely their sensory and motor skills, they will actively explore their environment while they do so. They will have no sense of being apart from other people and also no concept of object permanence. (When an object is hidden from their view they believe that it simply ceases to exist anymore) Piaget found that only at the age of four months will children show an awareness of an object still existing beyond their own point of view, but will become uninterested in it. Between 9-12 months he found that children will search where they last saw an object but do not fully understand why or even simply that an object is in the place it disappeared last.

This is known as the ‘A not B’ error.

As language development starts later on into this stage, Piaget found that children start demonstrating the ability to recognise symbolic representations as they begin make-believe play. (e.g. cardboard box as a house)

Preoperational stage (2-7 years old):

During this stage the child will be fully capable of symbolic thought. This stage was the stage most thoroughly studied by Piaget. For most of his research here he used Clinical interviews and found that there were several limitations to children’s thinking at this early stage.

Children in the early period of this stage (PRECONCEPTUAL) demonstrate animism (The belief that inanimate objects have feelings and personalities).

There is also an abundance of egocentrism during this stage. Children at this stage are often unable to see anything from another’s point of view. Piaget and Inhelder carried out the famous three mountains study. Objects were placed around a large model mountain that the child could walk around the model and see what models were placed around it. When they were standing in a single place, only able to some of the models, they were asked what they were able to see, then what someone on another side of the table was able to see:

Four year olds were almost completely unable to see from another’s point of view and would naturally assume that the other person/point of view would see the same objects as themselves.

Six year olds tended to show some awareness of another point of view.

Nine year olds realised what the correct answer and were able to describe what the other point of view would see.

Hughes and Donaldson (PEWS AND DOLLS) conducted a similar study which involved a model brick wall in the shape of a cross and three dolls which the children were asked to position into particular places so that they could or couldn’t see one another. They found that young children are able to accomplish a task which involves being able to see from the view of another, Hughes and Donaldson (PEWS AND DOLLS) claimed this was probably due to how much simpler the task was. One could argue it’s also due to how the child’s own view wasn’t involved and therefore could not influence the rest of the test.

Also at this stage a child’s ability is blocked by centration (the ability to only focus on one thing in the environment at a time). This is supported by Piaget’s experiments into conservation.

For example Piaget would present a child with two identical glasses filled with the same amount of liquid and would ask the children if they both had the same amount of liquid in. The child would inevitably say yes to which Piaget would respond by placing the liquids in different glasses (one tall and thin the other short and fat) and ask the same question. The children were often unable to understand that the amount of the liquid had not changed. This shows centrationbecause they were only able to focus on the shape of the liquid and glass while unable to understand how the amount had not changed.

Concrete operational stage:

Children at this stage will become capable of performing what is known as an operation which is a mental process such as working out a mathematical calculation in your head. Two other features of the concrete operational stage include:

  • Reversible thinking – The ability to add and subtract, understanding that subtracting is the reverse of adding.
  • Decentration – The children should now be able to perform the conservation tasks correctly, there is less of an egocentric state of mind in the children.

Piaget states that children will be able to conserve things in a particular order, number coming first and volume coming last. This stage is called concrete because of the way children need to use real objects in order to start using logic and mental processes to work things out. They are unable to have operations on something that they have not physically experienced, they cannot just imagine a new situation and then proceed to work it out at this early age.

Formal operational stage:

Children at this stage will begin to reason and perform operations without any physical representations. They will develop the ability to:

  1. Follow an argument without reference to it’s content, being able to reason and make sense of the principles.
  2. Think hypothetically about situations that they have never experienced. This supports the idea that there is further decentration present. Teens may start to think more about ideas and beliefs such as religion, or becoming a vegetarian because of not wanting to harm animals.
  3. They are able to test ideas bit by bit. Piaget gave children weights and a length of string, having them test what affects the swing of a pendulum. Children at the stage of formal operational thinking were able to test the weights then the length of the string, making sure all the possibilities have been explored.

Evaluation of Piaget:

  1. Piaget’s stage theory concept has been heavily criticised, even he himself has stated that perhaps cognitive development can be better thought of as a continuous process rather than a step by step one. Many state that given evidence does not support the stage theory, perhaps Piaget was simply influenced by other leading psychologists of the time who used stages such as Freud’s stages of Psychosexual development.
  2. The methodology of Piaget arguable relied too much on the process of the clinical interview. This was a process made up of question and answer unstructured interviews making it nigh on impossible to effectively compare data. This is due to how the questions or tasks would have been different for each child, experimenter bias was a possibility. His data was more qualitative than quantitative and not much was released regarding his sampling methods.
  1. It is also commonly believed that Piaget underestimated the cognitive abilities of children for example Bower (BOWSER: SEEK THE PRINCESS) challenged his ideas that children under the age of 8 months had no idea of object permanence. Bower (BOWSER: SEEK THE PRINCESS) showed that children as young as 6 weeks were able to show some indication that they were aware that objects did not disappear once out of their view. While a child was reaching for an object the lights were turned out and an infra red camera showed that they continued to reach for the object.

Again, Hughes and Donaldson (PEWS AND DOLLS) showed that by performing some of the tasks in a more understandable manner for the young children they were able to show more developed cognitive abilities.

Another thing to note is how all children of course develop at different rates, yet Piaget barely touched upon this, only that there is a fixed sequence of cognitive development.

Despite all of this Piaget remains one of the key figures in developmental psychology, mostly due to his emphasis on constructivist views, the views that children construct their own cognitive ability by taking parts of their environment and adding them on to their own experience.

Key points:

  • Children respond to information in a manner dependent on their stage in cognitive development.
  • Key processes include conservation, centration, egocentrism and class inclusion.
  • Key studies include sleeping cows (ARE THERE MORE BLACK COWS OR SLEEPING ONES?), three mountains and conservation.
  • Recent studies have shown that children are capable of higher cognitive abilities earlier than Piaget believed.
  • Donaldson worked to prove this.
  • Highlighted two limitations of children at a young age, egocentrism and centration.
  • Rarely discussed how social processes affect development.

Here we go

Well the English Literature exam is tomorrow and the Macbeth piece is the final English related post I’m uploading so best of luck to all of you and I hope my work has helped you guys in some way or another I really do.

Peace out and God bless,


LIT4: Macbeth

The Shakespearean Tragedy Macbeth

Historical context:

When Mary Tudor died in 1558, her sister Elizabeth became the Queen of England. During her reign Mary sought to make a primarily Catholic England, persecuting and executing Protestants. Elizabeth made it her goal to reverse this National transformation. During this time England was under constant threat of invasion by France or Spain who both aimed to restore Bloody Mary’s vision of England. There was also much friction between England, Scotland and Ireland. Elizabeth never even married creating a risk of a civil war as there was no bloodline heir to the throne. 

Despite all of this England thrived, changing from a medieval society to a modern one. Discoveries in both science and exploration made it an exciting time when England was beginning to flourish. 

By the 16th Century there were very few large towns outside of London which itself was characterised by narrow streets and abysmal sanitation habits. The River Thames was practically an open sewer resulting in frequent serious outbreaks throughout Britain.

The Elizabethan Theatre:

 In spite of the grim conditions of the Capital, culture thrived in England as the popularity of plays led to the construction of theatres around the nation. The original of these was constructed near Bishopgate, deconstructed, and rebuilt next to the Thames being renamed as ‘The Globe’. These theatres, although split into sections for the different classes, were open to all. They were especially popular amongst the lower classes. Queen Elizabeth saw plays as a perfect means of propaganda as they connected to and were enjoyed by most of the English public. King James of Scotland carried on this support for the theatre. 

Mary Queen of Scots:

While Elizabeth was still the Queen of England, Mary the Queen of Scots claimed her right to the English throne because her Grandmother was the sister of Henry VIII. Returning from France to Scotland it came as a surprise to her that she wasn’t more welcomed by the noblemen of Scotland, although this probably had something to do with her Catholic beliefs. After a confrontation with the Protestant leaders in Scotland she was imprisoned in her own country. 

When she fled to England she was imprisoned and soon caught sending letters involving her plot to overtake the English throne. Queen Elizabeth was left with no choice but to sign her death warrant. 

James I:

Mary’s own son who became King James VI of Scotland in her absence was invited to become the King of England upon the death of Queen Elizabeth. He was very keen on the development of the arts in England. He adopted Shakespeare’s theatre group, which was at the time known as The Lord Chamberlain’s Men, and renamed them as The King’s Men. Previously The Lord Chamberlain’s men performed for Queen Elizabeth around three times per year, The King’s men performed for King James about twenty times per year. This shows the explosion in popularity of Shakespeare’s plays. Shakespeare wisely chose to avoid the topic of Religion, explicitly at least. During the reign of Queen Elizabeth Shakespeare’s plays were mostly comedies or historical stories, but when King James came to rule, as society was becoming somewhat more introspective, the plays in turn became deeper.

Superstition and Witchcraft:

King James was strangely afraid of Witches and never took a bath, he was even said to have preferred the company of young men to women. Obviously the Gunpowder plot of 1605 did nothing but encourage his paranoia. Although well educated and incredibly intelligent, King James was constantly in fear of his life. He oversawWitch trials such as those in North Berwick were innocent women were rounded up and executed because of suspicion, King James even went as far as to write a book titled Daemonologie. Shakespeare followed suit in his plays in the way in which they began to include alot more of the dark and mysterious, the weird sisters of Macbeth being a prime example. 

With King James’ support of the theatre special effects began to be produced and used for shows in the evening, adding to the supernatural atmosphere. 

Historical background of Macbeth: 

Macbeth, perhaps Shakespeare’s most gruesome play, was first performed in front of King James himself, it was a perfect example of the change in time and attitude. 

According to historical records not only did Macbeth face King Duncan on the battlefield and win the crown of Scotland from him fair and square. But apparently Banquo, Macbeth’s friend fought alongside him. There is still much discussion as to whether Banquo ever truly existed or whether he was simply created in historical records to please King James. This is because many claimed and suggested that Banquo was King James’ ancestor, putting Shakespeare in a difficult situation. He did not want to risk upsetting King James and place Banquo as a co-conspirator, so he changed ‘history’. 

Shakespeare even wrote in the joining of the English and Scottish forces, echoing the joining of the two nations under the reign of King James himself. Shakespeare’s source for the historical events mentioned ‘three women in strange and wild apparel’ predicting Macbeth’s kingship, this gave Shakespeare a perfect opportunity to include witches. The reality is that Shakespeare’s source Raphael Holinshed’s Chronicles were mere storytelling and that Macbeth was a good king. Macbeth not only ruled for seventeen years, but was also buried on the Holy Island of Iona alongside other Scottish Kings. It’s important to remember that the real Macbeth did not murder Duncan in cold blood, it was on the battlefield and historically this was quite normal. 

Brief Plot summary:

In the beginning of the play we are introduced to three witches known as the Weird Sisters who intend to meet Macbeth. We then soon learn of Macbeth’s bravery on the battlefield and his role in defeating he enemies of Scotland. We are also told of two traitors to King Duncan of Scotland, Macdonwald and the Thane of Cawdor. Duncan sends Ross to inform Macbeth that has has been awarded the Thane of Cawdor’s title. Moments before he is able to do so the Weird Sisters confront Macbeth and Banquo, predicting their futures as a king and a father of kings. Macbeth comes to realise that the only way this would be possible is if he were to murder his King.

Although full of doubt Macbeth is finally persuaded to commit the deed by his wife. She gets him to murder Duncan and place the blame on the grooms. Now with a grip on the throne, Macbeth wants to make sure he is secure on the throne. Knowing that Banquo was predicted to be the father of kings he hires thugs to kill Banquo and his son Fleance, Banquo is run down but Fleance escapes.

Macbeth begins to see anyone who doesn’t fully support him as an enemy and has them killed. Being suspicious of Macduff who refused to attend his coronation, he has his family murdered. Meanwhile Lady Macbeth who was the stronger character in the start has become haunted in her role of Duncan’s murder. Macbeth turns to the advice as he no longer has anyone close to turn to. Their predictions are incredibly misleading and seemingly unrealistic fooling Macbeth into thinking himself safe. Lady Macbeth commits suicide soon afterwards.

Meanwhile in England plans are being made to restore Duncan’s son Malcolm to the throne. The English and Scottish forces join together to defeat Macbeth’s force. Macduff kills Macbeth and order is restored to Scotland.

Detailed Plot Summary:

Act 1:

As a storm occurs three witches named the Weird Sisters plan on meeting with Macbeth. Meanwhile at Macbeth’s camp King Duncan of Scotland hears of his bravery and skill on the battlefield. He is also informed of the treachery of on of his Thanes, to reward Macbeth, this title is bestowed upon him. Returning from the battlefield Macbeth and Banquo encounter the witches. ‘wither’d and so wild in their attire’. The witches foretell that Macbeth will become the Thane of Cawdor and ‘King hereafter’, Banquo on the other hand they foretell will be the father of Kings. The witches vanish and Ross arrives that very moment to inform Macbeth of his good news. Macbeth, seeing part of the witches prediction come true begins to wonder if there is a chance that he ever really may get a grip on the Scottish Throne, soon however he hears that Duncan has announced his son Malcolm will take the throne.

Macbeth begins to think about murder but the concept repels him (despite his experience on the battlefield) it ‘Shakes…(his)…single state of man.’ Lady Macbeth, who learns of the prophecies sees Macbeth as ‘too full o’ the milk of human kindness’ to commit the act. She then strives to persuade him to do so.

After Duncan and his group arrive at Macbeth’s grounds, Macbeth makes his thoughts and doubts clear on the matter of the murder, it is only by ridiculing Macbeth’s masculinity that Lady Macbeth finally manages to persuade him to kill Duncan.

Section notes:

  • Witches hold a strong link to the supernatural, an incredibly prominent Gothic theme present in Macbeth.
  • The very idea of Macbeth murdering his king, particularly after receiving such kindness from the man seems preposterous for so many reasons. If not for the persuasion of Lady Macbeth the event would never have taken place.
  • In Act 1 Macbeth is not yet evil, quite the opposite. He is not simply a callous warrior who thrives in violence either, Lady Macbeth even says in her soliloquy how nice he is:‘too full o’ the milk of human kindness’
  • There’s reference to a raven in the beginning of the soliloquy is one of ill omen in Celtic Mythology. The Vikings took ravens along on raiding parties when they would rape and pillage.
  • Lady Macbeth doesn’t necessarily follow the Gothic conventions of female characters, although like Catherine, she is very manipulative in her ways much like a femme-fatale.
  • As we are introduced to the play by the witches they basically inform the audience that nothing is really what it seems:

Fair is foul and foul Is fair– This theme of deception is onlyreinforced by the treachery suffered by King Duncan at the beginning of the play.

Act 2:

While preparing himself to murder Duncan Macbeth has further doubts and is hit by hallucinations. The midnight bell wakes him and drives him to action.

As Lady Macbeth informs the audience that she has drugged the grooms to make it easier for Macbeth, he returns stating that he has ‘done the deed’. Lady Macbeth sees that he has brought the murder weapon back with him and so urges him to return, Macbeth, already filled with regret and horror at his own actions refuses. She leaves to go do it herself, accusing him of cowardice. (‘My hands are of your colour but I shame to wear a heart so white’) She places the dagger in Duncan’s room and smears blood on the faces of the grooms.

There is a sudden knocking downstairs which begins to drive Macbeth insane, he becomes appalled with the blood covering his hands. Lady Macbeth dismisses his fears, reminding him how easily water will wash away the blood (‘a little water clears us of this deed’). A drunken porter admits Macduff into the castle. Macduff is in charge of King Duncan’s safety finds his body and declares ‘murder and treason’. Lady Macbeth pretends to be surprised while Macbeth informs the group how he killed the grooms in fit of rage.

Duncan’s sons Malcolm and Donalbain who fear for their lives flee to England and Ireland. They not only fear for their own lives, but also getting the blame placed upon them for the murder of Duncan, Macduff however, is already suspicious of Macbeth and states his refusal to attend his coronation.

Sections notes:

  • Macbeth’s actions finally put into motion by the midnight bell, reminiscent of a werewolf at full moon. – supernatural theme.
  • Lady Macbeth shows her evil side this early into the play as she’s incredibly harsh on Macbeth. Accusing him of cowardice she goes ahead and places the dagger and smears blood on the faces of the grooms herself, showing her dominance.
  • Lady Macbeth is the most practical party in the murder of Duncan, and (REMEMBER THIS FOR LATER) dismissive of how her hands are covered in blood:

‘A little water will clear us of this deed’

  • Shakespeare focusses on the off stage murder of Duncan. Firstly because we can imagine it would be difficult to effectively stage such a scene and secondly it builds the tension, there is nothing more frightening to a human being than the fears our own imaginations is able to conjure up.
  • The Drunken porter describes himself as the ‘porter of hell gate
  • It’s worth noting that Macduff’s knocking is what causes perhaps the most distress to Macbeth, Macduff is the very man who finally defeats Macbeth in the conclusion of the play.
  • The supernatural is strongly linked to the actions of Macbeth and his wife, their actions have turned the world to chaos, day is night, (by the clock, ’tis day,
    And yet dark night strangles the travelling lamp) horses ‘made war with mankind’ – similar to how Frankenstein’s acts turned his whole world to chaos and unease.
  • Macbeth’s actions even seem to have distorted what seems right and just as a noble and rewarding king has been replaced by a cruel dictator.
  • The first indication of Macbeth’s guilt use the elements to show an extreme amount of remorse:

‘The multitudinous sees incarnadine making the green one red.’

  • gashed stabs look’d like a breach in nature – emphasis on how unnatural and extreme these events are.

Act 3:

Banquo reveals his doubts about Macbeth’s part in the murder through a soliloquy, Macbeth reminds him ‘fail not our feast’. The reality is that Macbeth intends for Banquo to be absent anyway as he plans to have both Banquo and his son Fleance killed. This is because of the witches prophecy and so Macbeth sees Banquo and his son as a threat to his grip on the throne. As long as they live Macbeth believes that Duncan’s murder has merely ‘plac’d a fruitless crown’ upon his head.

Macbeth instructs the murderers on their task and sends them to get the job done. He then goes to meet Lady Macbeth who is quite concerned about his actions and how troubled he seems. She reminds him that ‘what’s done is done’. He on the other hand feels that they have scorch’d the snake, not killed it.’ He reveals to Lady Macbeth that he has a plan but will not reveal it until it has been completed:

‘Be innocent of the knowledge dearest Chuck

Banquo is assassinated but Fleance escapes into the darkness of the night, Macbeth becomes unhinged at the sound of the news and sees Banquo’s ghost at the dinner table that night, his obscene behaviour disturbs all the guests and ruins the night. He informs Lady Macbeth of his suspicion of Macduff and states his intention to see the witches once again.

Hecate, leader of the witches chastises the sisters for not including her in the decision to reveal Macbeth’s future to him. She commands them to prepare for his upcoming visit where they they will ‘draw him on to his confusion. The Act ends with Lennox and a Lord discussing the recent events, they reveal that Macduff has not only displeased Macbeth by missing his Coronation celebration but has also gone to plead support from the King of England to restore stability to Scotland.

Section Notes:

  • Macbeth wishes to have Banquo and Fleance killed otherwise he may have fil’d…(his)… eternal jewel for nothing.
  • ‘Let every man be the master of his time til seven at night’ – The celebration of Macbeth’s Coronation seems to mark the true beginning to his dictatorship.
  • There appears to be a change of dynamic when Macbeth refuses to tell Lady Macbeth about his plans for Banquo, she is slowly becoming more timid and fearful while he is the one taking action. Macbeth has become accustomed to murder.
  • We cannot tell whether Macbeth’s vision of Banquo’s ghost is supernatural or psychological. This kind of confusion of the mind is typical of the Gothic School of Terror.
  • The fact that Macbeth saw Banquo’s ghost and not Duncan’s (who he also murdered) is a sign that he is still haunted by Banquo in the sense that his son still lives, his prophecy may still come true.
  • Macbeth almost appears angry and jealous at Duncan as he is dead and can suffer no more. This shows a very warped way of thinking:

‘Nothing can touch him further.’

  • ‘But now I am cabin’d, cribb’d, confin’d’ Macbeth feels claustraphobic in his guilt.
  • Banquo is compared to a snake (again a warped frame of mind as Macbeth is the one who has acted ‘the serpent under’) and Fleance to a worm, one to be crushed.
  • There is a strong sense of paranoia in Macbeth, a sense that heightens the theme of the supernatural:

‘When the brains were out the man would die. And there an end but now they rise again.’

  • ‘Blood will have blood’ foreshadowing.

Act 4:

The witches gather around the cauldron and and perform an incantation. As Macbeth arrives they summon three apparitions, three separate predictions for Macbeth’s future. He is first warned to ‘beware Macduff’ but this is followed by the second, reassuring news that ‘noneof woman born/Shall harm Macbeth.’ Finally the third tells him that he will not be conquered until Birnam Wood comes to his castle at Dunsinane. This calms Macbeth down, now he is only worried about Macduff. He still insists to know whether ‘Banquo’s issue’ will rule Scotland, but he is horrified when he sees a final apparition of eight kings, all looking remarkably similar to Banquo.

Lennox announces that Macduff has left for England and Macbeth curses himself for not dealing with him sooner, so he has Macduff’s family killed. This happens instantaneously in the next scene where Macduff’s wife and children are slaughtered.

In England Macduff is speaking with Malcolm, testing his loyalty to Scotland. Unsure whether Macduff believes him the killer or not Malcolm pretends that he would make a worse king than Macbeth. When Macduff then speaks so passionately about the grim future of Scotland Malcolm realises that Macduff only came seeking him for Scotland’s sake and so explains the truth to Macduff. Ross arrives moments later with the horrific news about Macduff’s family, Macduff swears revenge on ‘the fiend of Scotland‘.

Section notes:

  • Like how his wife did earlier in the play, the witches hold great power and influence over Macbeth. He has gone from listening to one extreme of evil to the next.
  • The name of the weird sisters comes from the Anglo-saxon word ‘Wyrd’ meaning doom.
  • Macbeth develops from peacefully and rather passively listening to the witches to seeking and demanding knowledge from them, thereby emphasising his over-reliance on them.
  • Macbeth does not heed Banquo’s warning to disregard their ‘supernatural soliciting’ and so they deceive him through their predictions. Macbeth is not only unaware that Macduff was ‘not of woman born’ (caesarian) but also that his grounds will be invaded by the English carrying the wood of Birnam.
  • Hearing the prediction of Macduff, Macbeth decides to be more proactive and has Macduff’s family killed even though it will be of absolutely no benefit to him. It just shows that Macbeth has become accustomed to the role of a bloodthirsty tyrant.
  • Macduff and Malcolm contrast to the evil Macbeth in the fact that their quest for the throne is justified, they strive to restore Scotland to its previous glory.
  • As Macduff is told of his family’s deaths he asks for time to ‘feel it as a man’, he’s practically saying it is not feminine to embrace your emotions. (Theme of Romanticism)
  • Note the discussion on the qualities required in a king, and how Macbeth does not fit under any of them:

‘Like a giant’s clothes upon a thieving dwarf.’

  • ‘I will fight her young ones in the nest against the owl – Macbeth is killing Macduff’s family for no reason other than to hurt him. Macbeth has become extremely sadistic.

Act 5:

Lady Macbeth has been seen sleepwalking whilst desperately trying to wash imaginary blood off her hands. She’s been heard speaking of how much blood ‘the old man’ had. More dramatically she speaks of a ‘damn’d spot’ which she is unable to remove.

Meanwhile the plot to overthrow the ‘tyrant’ Macbeth proceeds as the Scottish and English armies join near Birnam. As Macbeth hears of this, thinking of the witches predictions he remains defiant and states he would fight until ‘from bones, (his) flesh be hack’d.’ not fearing death ‘Till Birnam Forest come to Dunsinane.’ He then receives bad news as the Doctor comes along and informs him that he cannot cure his wife’s ailment brought on by her insanity.

Despite all of the above, Macbeth remains headstrong and defiant because of the misleading predictions. Unfortunately for him the enemy soldiers have been cutting Birnam wood for use as camouflage. As well as this many of Macbeth’s own men (for reasons we can only guess at) betray him and decide to fight for his enemies.

At the same time that Macbeth hears about the moving wood, he also hears about his wife’s suicide, he begins to ponder how futile his life is. (‘life is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing’) Ultimately he remembers that only one of those predictions has come true and still thinks himself invincible.

When Macbeth meets Young Siward on the battlefield he initially refuses to fight him explaining that there’s already too much Macduff blood on his hand as well as describing his ‘charmed life’. Young Siward insists on fighting him and dies by Macbeth’s hand. Macduff soon confronts him on the battlefield and reveals that he was born ‘from his mother’s womb/Untimely ripp’d Macbeth although fearful, taunts him ‘Lay on Macduff.’

Scotland is free from its ‘butcher and his fiend-like Queen’.

Section notes:

  • The scenes in Act 5 are short and speed up the action, especially on the battlefield near the end.
  • At the start of the scene Macbeth only appears slightly affected by the reports he receives concerning the approaching enemy forces. He certainly doesn’t receive them as good news but they are received as an irritation more than anything else, with an inflated ego after hearing the predictions, he remains defiant.
  • It still seems odd that during the fulfilment of one of the predictions he is not fearful and demands his suit of armour for him to fight. Either it’s from his life as a soldier, or maybe he’s truly lost a purpose to live.

Themes in Macbeth:


The urge for power is simply too strong for Macbeth, initially he appears to refrain but when his wife encourages him by simply mocking his manliness, he embraces the dark thoughts and temptations placed in his head by the witches, ignoring all common sense.

Initially he shows regret and remorse at his deed against Duncan, but soon as he loses common sense and falls to madness. He not only takes the word of the witches but actively seeks it.

On the other hand Lady Macbeth appears to undergo the opposite transformation. She turns from a steely, power hungry and determined individual who is encouraging the murder of King Duncan (and even goes as far as to plant the knife and frame the grooms herself) to a sleepwalking wreck who cannot be without a light out of fear of the darkness. This leads to her eventual suicide.

Ultimatelyambition is the ‘tragic flaw’ of Macbeth in the play, the very moment he is coerced into chasing it his life shoots downhill and he is overcome by his newfound obsession with his title as the king. Once he started on his violent self-righteous path, it was impossible for him to leave it.


Macbeth was set and written during a time when people believed God himself had hand-picked the royals and so the pyramidal structure of the hierarchy of society was somewhat sacred.

As every member of society was expected to show respect to the King, it was a common belief that as such, he would need to respond in kind, he would need to act ‘kingly’. Kindness and empaty being examples of this. Many believed that there was a direct link between theharmony of the world and the hierarchy of society, a disruption in one would cause havoc for both, any one who caused such a thing would have suffered dire consequences.

-When Macbeth kills King Duncan the night turns to chaos (similar to the harsh weather of the moors representing Wuthering Heights in comparison to Thrushcross Grange) and due to the violent way in which Macbeth claimed the throne (and held it) he becomes known as a ‘tyrant’ and ‘fiend’.

Macbeth is not seen as a man who holds ‘king-becoming graces’ and would never be able to hold the world in balance. It is as though Scotland needs a king as its healer it is waiting for one who…:

‘At his touch/Such sanctity hath heaven given his hand/They presently amend’

Appearance and reality:

The witches establish the theme of deception in their opening to the play:

Fair is foul and foul is fair nothing is truly what it seems in the play.

-Macbeth repeats this line after his role in the opening (off-stage) battle ‘so foul and fair a day I have not seen.’

To emphasize this theme Duncan later states that ‘there’s not art/ To find the mind’s construction in the face’ (do not judge a book by its cover) when speaking on the traitorous Thane of Cawdor. It’s profound how Macbeth is given that very title and acts in the same manner as its previous holder.

Lady Macbeth who is supposed to be the ‘honour’d hostess’ urges Macbeth to ‘look like the innocent flower/ But be the serpent under’t’.

Deception is even present when Malcolm the son of Duncan deceives Macduff into thinking

he would be a horrific king.

Of course one of the most significant examples of this theme is the moment the witches present their predictions to Macbeth, the predictions that are to ‘draw him on to his confusion’, the very predictions that put him into a false feeling of safety.

The supernatural:

People were far more superstitious back then than they are now on the matter of ghosts, the undead and demons. Again, people were also far more religious and ‘god-fearing’ in a sense, for example, many believed that the black death was simply a punishment from the hand of God.

King James himself had a strong belief in the supernatural and more specifically, a fear of witches. He ensured the North Berwick and Lancashire witch trials took place, out of respect and pre existing superstition the public followed suit in these beliefs.

Shakespeare took advantage of this and so wrote Macbeth so that it is the witches who awaken his desires by sinfully tempting him like the serpent itself, one could say that the moment he actually becomes ‘the serpent under’t’ he becomes a slave to their predictions. When they actually make their predictions they conjure up haunting and horrifyingly graphic apparitions while seeing the future (which would also have been rather disturbing to the 18th Century audience).

Also worth noting is how the weather turns dreadful every time the witches are present.

On the topic of the witches, they contrast greatly to the other characters in a manner more subtle than their powers. While every other character in Macbeth tends to speak in blank verse, they will speak in rhyming couplets and trochaic metre, these features make even their language stand out. It makes the disturbing nature of their words more memorable.

Also rather significant to the theme are Macbeth’s visions of ghosts and daggers:

‘Is this a dagger which I see before me?’

Macbeth is unable to say amen, by killing the killing and going against God in a sense, he has cut himself off from God himself.

Lady Macbeth as though cursed for her earlier words, sleepwalks during her nightmares in which she seemingly repeats the moment of the murder over and over and is unable to clean the ‘damn’d spot’.

The manner in which the prediction about Birnam Wood comes true does not seem supernatural to the audience but it is important to remember to a character like Macbeth, it is in no way underwhelming, a terrifying prophecy has just come true in his eyes.

Finally worth mentioning is the night of the murder, the somewhat supernatural chaos that the world is thrown into seems incredibly Gothic. The food chain being disturbed and a falcon, towering in her pride of place, Was by a mousing owl hawk‘d at and kill’d , horses act as though they were to ‘make war with mankind’ and the area undergoes a storm. Daylight is even turned to night (by the clock, ’tis day,And yet dark night strangles the travelling lamp‘). Macbeth has literally plunged Scotland into darkness.

Motifs in Macbeth:


Macbeth announces that ‘blood will have blood’, from the very beginning, blood is mentioned, the Captain is covered in it after the battle. Macbeth sees an ‘air drawn (mental) dagger’ in his hand, however fatal the real dagger was for Duncan, this ‘air drawn’ one will be no less so for Macbeth.

Duncan’s blood covers Macbeth that he believes ‘great Neptune’s oceans’ will not be enough to wash it off later Lady Macbeth states that ‘all the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand.’ when she has gone insane from the guilt which appears to be represented by the blood. She cannot remove the ‘damn’d spot’.

Macbeth, undergoing the opposite transformation states that he is ‘in blood/Stepp’d in so far that…returning were as tedious as to go o’er’


The Darkness of the play is associated with fear, it is when much of the world is hidden from view. For instance most of the murders occur at night, when there are no witnesses around. Also both times that Macbeth meets the witches are shrouded in darkness.

Macbeth was unable to accept Banquo’s judgement of the witches as ‘instruments of darkness’ and so is succumbed by it.

Don’t forget how the world remains dark at noon the day after Duncan’s murder symbolising in a rather explicit manner how the world has fallen to darkness with Macbeth’s actions:

by the clock, ’tis day, And yet dark night strangles the travelling lamp

Lady Macbeth becomes terrified of the dark, she carries a light with her wherever she goes at night. It could represent the hell which she knows she is going to and how it is like the darkness swarming around her mind and tormenting her. It could also represent her own dark deeds that she is trying to forget. This eventually drives her to suicide.


  • There is a sense of pathetic fallacy when the witches enter as the thunder and lightning reflect their evil intentions and the chaos they are to bring about.
  • The mist of the play conceals many things, it makes things more vague and harder to see through much like Macbeth and how his downfall is echoed by fog thunder and lightning storms.-The weather represents the breakdown of the natural order much like the sight of horses eating each other or owls killing falcons.

Major characters:


Macbeth admits his ‘vaulting ambition’ gets the better of him, and Lady Macbeth believes that his nature is ‘too full o’th’ milk of human kindness’. This belief in his goodness is supported by his fear at killing his kinsmen, he believes it a ‘horrid image’, finding the advice given to be a ‘poison’d chalice.’

Macbeth is a soldier primarily, not a king, so just as the audience expects unlike the born king, he is simply unable to lead in a kingly manner and so is punished (alongside Scotland) for reaching above his given level.

He greatly contrasts to Malcolm who not only enlists help to take the throne (rather than striving for it himself), but also takes a strongly diplomatic stance on the situation.

Analyse, Macbeth’s behaviour upon seeing Banquo’s ghost at his banquet, some if not most of the Scottish Lords are extremely disturbed and lack faith in him as a leader the longer his reign endures the more people turn against him. By this stage Macduff has already shown his rejection and those of any sense will do so soon, any that don’t only live by Macbeth’s rule out of fear. Any who even show signs of opposing him will perish, for he has placed spies in every castle, emphasising his paranoia.

Macbeth becomes a nervous wreck after murdering Duncan, the urgent knocking at the gates appals him, makes him wish that they could ‘wake Duncan with knocking’ (or bring him back to life. When Duncan’s body is discovered he states that if he had ‘died an hour before this chance’ he would have lived ‘a blessed time’, however as he is putting an act on for the others, we cannot be sure whether he’s already accommodated to the situation, or whether he truly regrets his actions.

As he reflects on the witches predictions for himself and Banquo he states that the witches have placed a ‘fruitless crown’ upon his head while he has given his ‘eternal jewel’ to the ‘common enemy of man’ to get it. Macbeth is certain that he is going to hell and so takes the violence of his actions in his stride, he becomes ‘the common enemy of man.’ Macbeth does not even discuss his plan for another murder with his wife, telling he to ‘be innocent of the knowledge dearest chuck’.

On the thought of Banquo and the security of his own reign he tells Lady Macbeth that they have scorch’d the snake not killed it’ and so decides to have Banquo and his son Fleance murdered. What’s quite significant to the play is how as Macbeth becomes more and more obsessed with keeping a secure grip on his throne his killings appear to have less and less justification to the point where just to hurt Macduff, he has Macduff’s family killed. This causes the Scottish Lords to throw thehir lot in with the English who come to oppose Macbeth.

It is said that ‘his title hangs lose about him like a giant’s robe upon a dwarvish thief’ suggesting that Macbeth is no ‘giant’, he lacks the ability to be king. He does not have the qualities present in Duncan and Malcolm such as ‘honour, love, obedience, troops of friends’ all he has are ‘deep…curses’.

As the English and Scottish armies approach Macbeth’s castle he becomes more defiant of his oncoming fate. It is said at this stage how Macbeth ‘cannot buckle his distemper’d cause’ and how he acts with a ‘valiant fury’, even in the face of the overwhelming forces about to attack.

We briefly see a human side to him again the moment he hears of his wife’s death. He reflects on the futility of existence, he seems to have lost any reason to live:

‘life is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing’

For the work of a writer who often tried to avoid the topic of religion this seems awfully like a commentary on God.

His death by the hands of Macduff is inevitable as told by the witches and so the plot is cyclical, it ends and begins with Macduff/Macbeth killing a traitor.

Lady Macbeth:

Lady Macbeth is one of the most interesting and powerful characters in the play. She is referred to as the ‘fiend-like queen’ she is linked with evil., and at the very beginning of the play this is established in how she is already thinking of ways to have Duncan killed.

When Macbeth hesitates on the matter she insults him for being‘too full o’th milk of human kindness’ and as he refuses to go back to the room of the murder she abuses him for being ‘infirm of purpose’.

‘My hands of your colour but I shame to wear a heart so white.’

At this stage she not only returns the dagger herself, but also goes as far as to smear blood onto the grooms faces. As Macbeth stresses about not being able to get the blood out she is the one to say ‘ a little water clears us of this deed’, she is rather ignorant in how lightly she takes their actions.

This statement comes back to haunt her as she sleepwalks and has nightmares concerning the murder and a ‘damn’d spot’ which she cannot remove. At this time she is unable to be in the darkness without a lamp and falls into madness. This leads to her eventual suicide.

She initially takes advantage of Macbeth and uses him to gain power but as she weakens and withers he leaves her behind to keep pushing for power.

Despite this we still see signs that he cares for her like when he wishes her to be innocent of the knowledge of Banquo’s death. Perhaps it is her isolation that causes her to go insane. Her death is yet another punishment for Macbeth and his actions.

The witches:

If the Weird sisters had not met and made their predictions, he would never have murdered the king. They possess mystical powers that give them not only the ability to appear and disappear at will but also to see into the future.

It’s important to note how even they see Macbeth as evil, ‘something wicked this way comes,’ and even appear afraid of him as he threatens them and demands another prediction. The reality is that they are luring him into a false sense of security.

Because they speak in rhyming couplets and trochaic rhythm, their speech stands out from the usual blank verse of the play. They would have been somewhat mesmerising to an audience of the 18th Century.

There is always a sense of pathetic fallacy in the presence of the witches as it is always dark and misty when they enter the stage. On each occasion their entry is also announced by thunder and lightning, the power of the elements surrounding them reflects their own powers.


At the start of the play (being Macbeth’s dearest friend, Banquo, like Macbeth, is a courageous fighter and a loyal soldier.

The tempting predictions of the witches have far less of an effect on Banquo than Macbeth, he is not tempted. Sensing their malevolent nature, he is in fact the one who warns Macbeth to take no notice of the witches:

‘to win us to our arm

the instruments of darkness tell us truths

betray us in deepest consequence

He remains observant and wise in how he is suspicious of Macbeth the moment he is promoted to Thane of Cawdor:

New honors come upon him,

Like our strange garments, cleave not to their mould

But with the aid of use

The moment Duncan has been murdered Banquo has suspicions concerning Macbeth ‘play’d most foully’, despite this, being the loyal soldier that he is Banquo still shows undying loyalty to his new king and does not share his suspicions. This is perhaps his tragic flaw, his own naivety.


Duncan is a good king who shows and receives respect, rewards loyalty, his only clear concern is for his country.

As believed in Shakespearean times Duncan, a good King, was able to bring order and peace to Scotland. He certainly appears to hold many of the characteristics listed by Malcolm and Macduff. On the other hand if you are to analyse the story closely, if he’s so great a king why do traitors seemingly surround him?

He clearly holds a soft spot for Macbeth and his wife, with that knowledge and the fact that he’s had previous traitors, perhaps he is either too trusting or simply naïve.

Duncan also contrasts greatly with Macbeth in how he shows humility to him and his wife, confessing that he has not shown enough gratitude towards them.


Macduff displays extreme horror at the murder of Duncan displaying not only his love and respect for his leader, but also shows his commitment to his given job. At this same moment he shows a caring side as he shows care for the ‘gentle lady’ fearing what he may say just might upset her.

Despite everyone else being suspicious of Malcolm and Donalbain for fleeing the scene, Macduff appears to be a wise judge of character as he remains suspicious of Macbeth and refuses to attend his Coronation banquet.

This has already angered Macbeth so all it takes is word from the witches to watch out for Macduff for Macbeth to have Macduff’s family killed as he cannot reach Macduff himself. You could criticise Macduff for leaving his family in his country which he so passionately speaks of in chaos.

He finally gets his revenge upon Macbeth and thrives in it. He shows pure and grim delight, not only as he hoists the ‘hell hound’s’ ‘cursed head’ but also as he eliminates Macbeth’s illusion of invincibility the moment he states that he was ‘from his mother’s womb untimely ripp’d.’

Quick update

Working on a Wuthering Heights article which is the final book for my exam board at least. I’ll also try to have another psychology one up in the next two days.

Also for those asking (which is fair enough as this is rather odd) when I appear to write a load of absolute rubbish next to the name of each psychological researcher, tat’s really just my own very strange little way of remembering each of their names

While you wait for my next English piece check out my new favourite studying tune 😀


PSYCH 4: Friendship

The Development of Friendship

Friendship is another vital process to the development of a child. It helps to socialise children, to teach children what is socially sought for and more importantly, acceptable. Once a child has been accepted into a group or even gang, they will strive to remain part of that group, adjusting their own fashion and personality in order to do so.

Pre-school children:

In our early years we go through a very self-isolating time of play. At the ages of 0-2 this is called Solitary play and from 2-3, parallel play. During these stages children may play near or even alongside (parallel) to other children but will take little notice of them. At the stage of such young ages children don’t tend to develop close friendships, the only other children they tend to bond with are their siblings.

Gender is not an issue at this age.

From the ages of 3-4 children begin to form real relationships with others around their age. These may be very shortliving, but intense. Piaget argued that because children are so egocentricat this stage they do not see the long term benefits of the friendship, nor do they consider the other’s feelings.

The purpose of friendship at this age is to help children learn more about relationships. Games such a ‘Mummies and Daddies’ and ‘Doctors and Nurses’ help them to learn and reinforce existing knowledge through each other. It’s also a known observation that during such games particular children use this as an opportunity to assert their dominance.

Middle Childhood:

It is around this stage that friends become more important to children, and these children tend to conform more to what is socially acceptable in order to form or hold certain friendships. They become more gender aware, and so will tend to play exclusively with others of their own gender, in a ‘sex appropriate’ manner with sex appropriate’ toys.

Michael Lamb (1979) (BE A LAMB AND PLAY WITH THE RIGHT TOYS) found that if a child picked up a toy that wasn’t ‘socially acceptable’ for their gender (e.g. if a boy picked up a doll) they would be shunned by their social group until they realised that the toy was the cause of this and put it down.

Friends are found at this stage through the same activities, as long as the two children see each other enough their friendship should continue. Right now physical appearance, race and social class won’t matter or even stand out to the children unless their parents point this out.

Older childhood:

Between the ages of 6 and 12 children will become yet even more conformist. Their social group/s will develop norms and values that the members are expected to follow in order to gain recognition from the group. But children are not mindless, they will not follow any instruction simply because another more popular child tells them to do so. At this stage children have developed a free will and know what they want in a friend.

Youniss (1994) (YOU ‘N I START SOLIDARITY?) had dozens of children (at different stages of childhood) interviewed about how another child would let them know that they liked them. The older the child becomes the more aware they are of others.

  • Between 6-8 stories are told of giving and sharing objects such as sweets. – Extent of friendship signified by quantity of goods.
  • 9-11 told stories about being fair and equal.
  • 12-14 strayed from physical objects and placed emphasis on phsychological support.

Children stray from the material and egocentric viewpoints as they mature.

These peers tend to have two effects on the children:

  1. Peers are seen as rivals for the teacher’s attention, actually being the one with the most attention can produce the most stigma against them (‘teacher’s pet’)
  2. Bandura states that children learn by modelling themselves based on others. An intelligent and successful peer can also be a positive role model despite their lack of life experience.

Other psychologists have studied the development of friendships through the different stages of childhood:

Selman and Jaquette (1977) (STILL WANT A JACKET FRIEND?) asked 225 individuals between the ages of 4 and 32 about friendship.

  • 3-7 – Playing together
  • 4-9 – Giving help without any focus or thought on reciprocation
  • 6-12 – Focus on reciprocation
  • 9-15 – Intimacy and sharing (Similar to Youniss’ discovery of emphasis on psychological support)
  • 12-adult – Interdependence

Rotenburg (1984) (RELIANT ON BOYS) found that at the age of 7 boys begin to trust other boys more than girls (and vice versa) and will no longer befriend girls until their pubescent years when an attraction for girls develops.

Sex Differences in Children’s Friendships:

Waldrop and Haverson (1975) (WE’LL GROUP) suggested that boys will tend to have extensive friendships, they will see a social group as a network of friends formed due to their similar activities. On the other hand they suggested that girls form more intensive, closer relationships.

The idea that girls tend to operate their friendships in small social groups, while boys on the other hand favour larger groups is supported by Mackoby and Jackson.

Mackoby and Jackson (PHYSICAL) found that boys tend to get themselves involved in far more aggressive play than girls. Boys will ‘test out’ each other at the start of a friendship, this is normally done through physical play. (Large groups, rough play and physical aggression of boys (to younger and lower boys in the hierarchy) supported by Rose and Rudolph (2006))

There is even a difference in the unpleasantries of friendships between boys and girls, boys will more likely display their anger through physical aggression and girls on the other hand will exhibit hostility or use a passive aggressive attitude in such situations. (R&R)

Popularity and rejection:

Parenting styles:

Some psychologists suggest that is it the type of care that has been given to us by our parents or guardians that determines our popularity or perhaps more accurately our social competence. Children with closer guardians are more likely to form closer attachments with their peers. Some evidence suggests that some children who haduninvolved or overlyharsh carers were rejected by their peers in school due to their uncooperative and aggressive nature that has developed. This rejection continues making the problem worse.

Temperamental characteristics:

Children who are irritable and impulsive are more likely to form more troublesome friendships making them more likely to be rejected, on the other hand children who are passive and slow to become involved are often left behind from the developing social groups and soon rejected.

Dodge (DODGE HIS BEHAVIOUR) found that children were rejected or neglected from the social groups in their school because they did not act appropriately socially. Their behaviour should explain why they are rejected.

Bonn and Kruger’s (BRING ON RECRUITING) study conflicts with this. Their study on a South African school found that the difference between popular children and unpopular children was not how they acted but the amount of children who helped bring them into the group. The importance was mainly their pre-existing friendships.

Cognitive skills:

From 8-13 years old, children with well developed role-taking skills are more likely to have intimate friendships, also note how popular children tend to score higher on IQ tests than unpopular children.

Physical attractiveness:

Research suggests that as early as 12 months old children will tend to show preference for the ‘attractive’. By the age of 4 children will describe their attractive peers more favourably than their unattractive ones. By 5 the ‘unattractive’ children will act more boisterously, responding aggressively to comments from their peers. It’s possible that attractive children will receive more compliments unlike the unattractive ones and each child may be experiencing a self-fulfilling prophecy.

This rejection and neglect of peers could result in the child internalising their problems (anxiety, depression) or externalisingtheir problems (aggression truancy, delinquency). Parker and Asher (REMEMBER LIKE HOT ASHES) found that children who experience rejection and neglect are more likely to experience mental difficulties in their later lives.

Xie et al. (SEE how IT ALL develops) Found that at the age of 6 children think popularity is caused by positive social behaviours, at 9 and 12 appearance was far more important. At the age of 12 deviant behaviour was mentioned more than any time before.

Sociometry would have been used (marking who is friends with who and who has more friends) to examine these characteristics.

LIT3: Wuthering Heights

Wuthering Heights

The Author:

Emily Bronte, born in 1818, was the daughter of a clergyman. Alongside her sisters Charlotte and Anne she would grow to be a key part of one of the most famous families in literature.

At the young age of three Emily lost her mother to cancer. Later in their lives at school the Bronte sisters suffered to the cold and lack of food, and eventually a typhoid epidemic swept through their school leaving them recovering from the death of two of their siblings.

Their father was incredibly strict and made the girls sit in a room together in silence. Emily and Charlotte would escape into their writing, together they created a fictional world called Gondal.

Links have been made between the harsh and isolated Yorkshire landscape (perhaps similar to her upbringing?) and the raw elemental writing of Emily Bronte. Many also stress the importance of the time in which Wuthering Heights was written, a time when women were still being held back by sexist societal views. All of the Bronte sister’s novels were published under male pseudonyms. Some even go as far as to theorise that Cathy was created to represent all the pent-up desires and characteristics of Emily Bronte.

A Balanced Approach:

It’s important not to read Wuthering Heights with a one sided view. You’ll miss so much substance from the book if you just see Heathcliff as a dark romantic man, or Cathy as solely a selfish heartless being. There is so much depth to almost every aspect of the novel. For instance, Heathcliff is ‘mass of contradictions’, he’s an utter brute, he beats animals and humans alike, he holds an obsession for Cathy that will keep him going on his course of destruction no matter who he hurts along the way. On the other hand you’ll find like Frankenstein’s monster, he is a noble savage, a victim of circumstance and still clearly displays genuine care and tenderness towards Catherine.

Catherine on the other hand is incredibly mischievous at a younger age and never really sees the torment she inflicts upon others, and she inflicts such pain upon almost every other character in the novel. However she also has a deeper side, she holds a burning passion for Heathcliff and despite her circumstances doesn’t show signs of snobbishness like her brother.

Chapters 1-3:

Mr Lockwood (The narrator) rents Thrushcross Grange from Heathcliff. Lockwood goes to Wuthering Heights to visit Heathcliff but gets snowed in for the night. He finds both the building and its inhabitants forbidding and unnerving.

Lockwood finds a bible in his bedroom that used to belong to Catherine. During the night he has a nightmare about Catherine trying to make her way into the window.

  • ‘An almost melancholy voice sobbed… ‘Let me in! Let me in!’ – This is a common theme of the Gothic genre, escaping the melancholy.
  • Through description alone the reader is instantly made to feel unwelcome:

Black eyes

  • ‘Wuthering’ is used to describe the grim atmosphere of the stormy moors.
  • Even the description of the environment is used to emphasize the darkness of the moors:

    ‘thorns all stretching their limbs one way as if craving alms of the sun.’ – even something stereotypically dark/evil is seemingly seeking light from the evil of the moors.

  • On first impression Heathcliff fits the characteristics of a Gothic protagonist. He is an attractive and an emotionally reserved mysterious male.
  • Heathcliff shows no affection towards the dogs.
  • Chapter 2 again, shows signs of a very unwelcoming host and atmosphere:

‘The tone in which the words were said revealed a genuine bad nature.’

‘A sorrowful sight I saw: dark night coming down prematurely.’

-Similar to Macbeth.

  • Heathcliff’s paranoia about Catherine’s old room heightens the sense of mystery and fear of this dark man:

‘A stranger is a stranger… permit anyone the range of the place while I am off guard.’


  • Wuthering Heights is described to be a ‘perfect Misanthrop’s heaven‘. There are multiple references to how isolated it is. One may say that it is removed from normal society, surrounded in fog it is its own little world. A world not governed by our own laws or social constraints.
  • Lockwood has a desire to be alone has led him to this isolated place. Yet he is drawn to Heathcliff, for a ‘misanthrop’ it’s odd that he wishes to see someone so unwelcoming (let alone anyone) two days in a row.
  • Dreams are used as portents (giving a sense of foreboding) or symbols.
  • There is an abundance of the supernatural in these early chapters, Lockwood calls Wuthering Heights ‘Haunted’ and ‘swarming with ghosts and goblins‘. These words are used quite lightly by Lockwod and ‘goblins’ shows this, he doesn’t get how seriously dark and twisted Wuthering Heights and its history actually is. Heathcliff believes in Catherine’s ghost.
  • The brutal tone of the novel is set when everything become grotesque during Lockwood’s nightmare:

BLOOD ran down and soaked the bedclothes’

Chapters 4-7:

(I’ve lost my notes for the next few sections so most of the following is done in a rush or taken straight from my revision material)

Mrs Dean begins to tell Lockwood the tale of Heathcliff and Catherine’s upbringing. The owner of Wuthering heights, Mr Earnshaw, brings Heathcliff home with him after a trip to Liverpool. Earnshaw wants the orphan to be brought up alongside his own children. Earnshaw and Catherine welcome him into the family but Hindley acts incredibly cruel towards him.

Hindley is sent away to college but when his father dies he returns to Wuthering Heights with a wife in order to take over the estate and so drives Heathcliff out. Heathcliff continues to run wild on the moors with Catherine.

They wander onto the property of Thrushcross Grange after planning to run away together. Catherine is attacked by the guard dog and remains at the Grange with the Linton family who nurse her back to health. When she finally returns to Wuthering Heights she has changed, she has become more refined. Heathcliff cannot stand this change in her.

When the Lintons visit Wuthering Heights at Christmas, Edgar clashes with Heathcliff resulting in Hindley punishing Heathcliff by harshly beating him, this is the moment when it becomes apparent that Heathcliff intends to get his revenge on Hindley.


  • There’s a change in narrator much like Frankenstein, there is a story within a story.
  • Like the other noble savage Frankenstein’s creature, there’s no real background to Heathcliff. We aren’t made aware of his parents or where he’s from.
  • There’s a lot of casual violence in Wuthering Heights:

‘Hindley’s blows,’ ‘my pitches‘ ‘thrashings

  • Catherine is not a damsel, nor is she a femme-fatale, she’s her own character. She’s lively and complex.
  • At their happiest Heathcliff and Catherine were ‘as rude as savages‘, they lived their own lives and ignored the rules of society. It’s when they each give up to those rules that things go downhill.
  • Heathcliff is capable of and makes it clear that he’s willing to commit extreme violence:

‘I’d not exchange for a thousand lives… Hindley’s blood

  • There is a huge contrast between Thrushcross Grange and Wuthering heights, both in atmosphere and in their names. The Grange gives a sense of culture and peace in comparison to Wuthering Heights’ chaos and isolation.
  • Heathcliff begs Nelly to ‘make me decent‘ he bows to the laws of society because of his love for Catherine. (rather a redeeming moment)
  • Words such as ‘fiends,‘ and ‘devil’s spies‘ are used around description of Heathcliff, like Frankenstein’s creature, it seems that he is touched by evil.
  • Also like in Frankenstein, Heathcliff’s life and misfortune is all seemingly pre-determined by his birth and heritage. Like the creature he is judged by his appearance.

Chapters 8-9:

Frances (Hindley’s wife) gives birth to Hareton and dies shortly afterwards. As Hindley reels from the loss of his wife, Hareton is left to the care of Nelly. The whole family structure is collapsing.

Catherine’s interest in Linton becomes serious as she begins to see him as a potential husband. Catherine speaks to Nelly about how her real love is for Heathcliff but she refuses to marry him given his social status:

‘If that wicked man had not brought Heathcliff so low’ – She almost despises Edgar for that.

Linton has the ability to give her security and comfort. Heathcliff overhears this conversation and leaves before hearing her final words in which she says that if she marries Linton she may be able to help Heathcliff.

Heathcliff disappears and Catherine moves to Thrushcross Grange with Edgar where three years later they marry.


  • Hindley’s rejection of God, something that in the 19th Century would imply a great degree of moral degeneration.
  • Heathcliff becomes more rough and brutal. Nelly says that he appears to be ‘possessed by something diabolical‘ – another Satan reference.
  • Catherine shows violence against Nelly, Edgar and baby Hareton, displaying her own degeneration.
  • There is a moment of such dark tone in the novel when Heathcliff catches Hareton after he fell from the stairs, and instantly regretted doing so. He has such a powerful obsession of revenge on Hindley that he would have ‘smashed Hareton’s skull on the steps‘ right there and then if he could have gotten away with it. His passion for revenge is so great that he would kill an innocent child so gruesomely for the chance of hurting the one he hates… when it is clear that Hindley does not even care much for the child.
  • Catherine claims that Heathcliff is more herself than she is, that they are soul-mates.
  • It will naturally seem unfair to the reader that Catherine refuses to be with Heathcliff because of his circumstances, but this leads back to balance. We may empathise with him now but his actions throughout the novel are often unforgivable, no matter the motivation.

Chapters 10-14:

Lockwood is ill for four weeks and very quickly begins to hate the isolation and bleak atmosphere of the countryside. As Nelly resumes her story he is told of how Edgar and Cathy lived a happy life at Thrushcross Grange until Heathcliff returns to the Moors and asks to see Catherine. Catherine is clearly ecstatic to see him again and soon begins to compare Edgar unfavourably next to him, friction soon develops between himself and Heathcliff. Heathcliff stays nearby at Wuthering Heights with Hindley where he exploits his greed and gambling habits.

As contact between Catherine and Heathcliff continues, Isabella falls for him. While he does not care for her at all, he sees the family fortune she has access to and an opportunity to get revenge on the Linton family.

Nelly visits Wuthering Heights and is appalled at the goings on there. Hareton is practically being raised by Heathcliff now, badly (obviously). Meanwhile, Heathcliff is spending his time pursuing Isabella, Nelly wastes no time in informing Edgar of this. The two have a showdown in which Catherine doesn’t act as one would expect a wife at the time to, she forces her husband to fight like a man or apologise. Son after she has a fit and falls ill. While delirious she rambles about her love of Heathcliff and Wuthering heights. Elsewhere Heathcliff has eloped with Isabella who Edgar has disowned.

As Catherine slowly recovers she remains fragile and depressed, she also finds out that she is pregnant. Two months pass and Heathcliff and Isabella return to Wuthering Heights followed by Nelly receiving a letter from Isabella telling of the terrible conditions she is living under (Note the abundance of violence). When Nelly visits Wuthering Heights she soon discovers that Isabella has been reduced to a ‘slattern‘, strangely Heathcliff is appearing to be even more of a gentleman in Nelly’s presence.

He then goes on to ask Nelly to arrange a meeting between himself and Catherine, when she refuses, his true nature reveals itself. He harshly abuses Isabella forcing Nelly to arrange it.


  • When Heathcliff returns he has undergone a clear transformation. Although in appearance he has become a gentleman, there is something incredibly threatening and brooding about him. His obsession with revenge has clearly driven him and kept him going (like Frankenstein AND his monster). All he wishes is to get his revenge on Hindley and kill himself. (bare in mind how sacrilegious suicide was and is seen):

‘No God shall not have the satisfaction that I shall … while I’m thinking of that I don’t feel pain‘ – (Prometheus link?)

  • In Catherine’s speech about how Heathcliff’s return has ‘reconciled me to God and humanity’ we see that although she is incredibly self-centred, she is also capable of great love, a somewhat redeeming characteristic in her. She is perhaps the only character who shows true hope in Heathcliff, with that hope taken away he experiences a self-fulfilling prophecy that others have put on him.
  • Isabella becomes a victim to both Heathcliff and Catherine who both despise her. She even becomes rejected by her own brother. If any character in Wuthering Heights is a damsel, it is Isabella.
  • Heathcliff is naturally incredibly persuasive and influential, he uses this to his advantage and acts incredibly manipulative towards all he can exploit.
  • Catherine’s increasing hysteria and violent words in Chapter 12. She believes the room is haunted and yearns for Heathcliff. Nelly in the meantime is being criticised by both Edgar and Catherine for how the situation is panning out.
  • Heathcliff hangs Isabella’s pet dog. His cruelty is appalling.
  • As Isabella describes life at Wuthering Heights we find that Hareton has been given so little attention that he is more of an animal than a child and Hindley is a drunkard who’s determined to kill Heathcliff.
  • Heathcliff points out that Isabella pictured him as some kind of romantic hero, just like many of the female readers of Wuthering Heights have done (or tried to do so). He personally describes how he hung her dog, he is open about his own cruelty and criticises such an ignorant trail of thought. (Breaking the fourth wall, perhaps a critique on society and how women are content to be dominated by such men.)
  • Heathcliff’s language matches Catherine’s at some stages in its intense and disturbing nature:

‘I have no pity! I have no pity! The more the worms writhe, the more I yearn to crush out their entrails! It is a moral teething; and I grind with greater energy in proportion to the increase in pain.’

– This also contrasts greatly with the more civil and higher class dialect of Edgar . A sign that Heathcliff and Catherine are made for each other.

Chapters 15-17:

Heathcliff finally manages to see Catherine at the Grange when Edgar is away. As passionate as their reunion is, Heathcliff realises that she will soon die. Unable to see the weight behind her words she states that Heathcliff and Linton are the reasons for her death. She taunts him by speaking of how is life will be like without her. On the other hand she’s happy to die knowing that they are as close as they could ever get:

‘he’s in my soul‘.

‘Nelly, I am Heathcliff

Catherine eventually gives birth to a baby girl and dies two months later. Heathcliff’s grief turns to rage:

‘Catherine Earnshaw you may not rest as long as I am living.

Heathcliff even torments her on her deathbed:

‘You have killed yourself. Yes you may kiss me… they’ll blight you, they’ll damn you

‘Be with me always take on any form drive me mad‘ – we as the readers get the feeling she does, and she has… This relates back to Lockwood’s nightmare

-‘I’ll never let you in, not if you beg for twenty years’…

‘It is twenty years… I’ve been a waif for twenty years’- Perhaps Heathcliff truly got what he desired.

The day before the funeral Heathcliff takes the locket in Catherine’s casket and replaces Edgar’s hair inside with his own. Nelly is aware of this and ensures both locks of hair are inside but twisted around one another, symbolising Catherine’s mess of a love affair for the two.

As we would expect from Catherine she is not buried in the Linton family grave, she is instead buried on the edge between the moorlands and the churchyard. (In love with Edgar but always on the edge of escaping their relationship)

Isabella escapes Wuthering Heights to London where she gives birth to Heathcliff’s son, Linton. Hindley dies soon afterwards and the estate is left to Heathcliff. Edgar Linton shuts himself off from the world although he does not exactly live in complete misery as we would expect, he still gets much joy from his daughter Cathy. When he tries to get custody of Hareton but Heathcliff says that if he does so he will bring Linton back to the heights.


  • Nelly describes Catherine as one ‘doomed to decayand how she possesses ‘unearthly beauty’.
  • There’s a strong presence of violence and passion between Catherine and Heathcliff. Even in their relationship they do not follow societal norms.
  • Catherine continuously refers to her own death as if she knows it’s going to happen or that she’s given up. ‘ You have killed me.’ Heathcliff becomes angry at her and accuses her of being possessed with a devil (much like himself). Their relationship is so destructive that the only way that either of them can escape it is through death.
  • ‘Your pride cannot blind God‘ Nelly’s assessment of how Heathcliff refuses to act like a normal upstanding decent human being. She speaks of how the extent of his anger will never allow him any form of peace.

-It’s worth noting here how Heathcliff lets his anger control him, even in his older age he despises Hareton because he is the son of one of Hindley. Edgar on the other hand welcomes Linton lovingly like his own son even though he is the son of Heathcliff. You could argue that Linton’s ability to let go of his hatred gives him a better, more peaceful life.

  • ‘May she wake in torment‘ – Heathcliff actually wishes for Catherine to suffer in hell, seemingly she does as he says because of Lockwood’s nightmare

Chapters 18-24:

Life becomes somewhat peaceful in the next twelve years that pass on the moors. Isabella leaves Linton to Edgar and while he goes away Cathy wanders the moors and comes across Wuthering Heights. She is first under the impression that Hareton is in fact the servant. She is shocked to find out that he is in fact her cousin, referring to Linton as her ‘real cousin’. When Edgar returns with Linton Heathcliff demands his son is returned to him. Although incredibly unpleasant to him, he does not physically harm him. Heathcliff is aware that when Edgar passes Linton will inherit Thrushcross Grange.

Cathy, being incredibly upset at her ‘real cousin’ being sent away actually soon forgets him. At the age of sixteen she meets Heathcliff and Hareton on the moors and accompanies them back to Wuthering Heights to see Linton.

When Edgar demands that Cathy doesn’t return to Wuthering Heights she becomes upset and insists on writing to Linton without her father’s approval. Heathcliff stops their correspondence and later informs Cathy that Linton is pining for her, guilting her into visiting him. A relationship between the two develops secretly until Nelly finds out about it. As Linton becomes more and more ill it becomes clear that although their meetings often end in arguments, there is a genuine sense of attraction and fondness between the two.


  • Cathy has grown into a beautiful and much more obedient (like her father) child than Catherine although she still holds some of the wilful and complex characteristics of her mother. When she meets Hareton there is even somewhat of a sense of deja vu. Due to the class differences their meeting is reminiscent of Heathcliff’s arrival to the Earnshaw family.
  • Linton shows only characteristics of Edgar, he is polite and timid, there are absolutely no signs of his biological inheritance from Heathcliff. (NATURE VS NURTURE!). Due to his delicate nature there is a sense of dramatic irony that Linton will not last long at Wuthering Heights.
  • Hareton’s attempts to improve himself are mocked by Cathy (the girl he has feelings for) and he is clearly jealous of her feelings for Linton. Again there is a sense of deja vu.
  • There is such a vast contrast between Cathy and Linton.

Chapters 25-34:

Nelly has almost finished her narration. At this point Edgar is dying and so is Linton. Heathcliff in the meantime has been scheming for Linton to marry Cathy before her death. Edgar finally agrees that the cousins should meet. It’s clear that Linton is only going through with the meet because of his fear of his father. Their second meet turns out to be a trap and Heathcliff holds Cathy (and Nelly) in the household so that he can make the two marry in order to ensure he will control the entire Linton estate.

The wedding finally occurs and Catherine runs away just in time to see her father before he passes away. (Note how peaceful Edgar’s passing is in comparison to Catherine and Heathcliff’s). After Edgar’s funeral Heathcliff goes to Thrushcross Grange to see Cathy and forcefully take her back to Wuthering Heights.

Although she has lost contact with Cathy, Nelly still hears of the goings on at Wuthering Heights via Zillah, a servant at Wuthering Heights. Cathy cares for Linton until his passing. She remains distant from the others living at the Heights and rejects Hareton and his approaches.

When Lockwood returns to Wuthering Heights to inform Heathcliff that he will be leaving for London he notices Cathy’s cruelty towards Hareton and That Heathcliff’s appearance has changed.

One year passes and Lockwood returns to the Heights, he finds that Cathy has changed her attitude towards Hareton and is teaching him to read. Nelly informs Lockwood that Heathcliff died three months earlier and is hopeful that Cathy and Hareton will marry.

Nelly also speaks of Heathcliff’s ‘queer end‘. He is constantly haunted by Catherine and sees her everywhere. He is driven to madness. He no longer wishes for revenge, only Catherine, he even experiences a ‘strange happiness‘ and welcomes death.

When they plan to marry it is said about Hareton and Cathy that ‘they are afraid of nothing… Together they would brave Satan and all his legions‘ – one could argue that by surviving the evil of Heathcliff they already have.

In typical Gothic fashion Wuthering Heights ends with a somewhat lighter tone, showing a glimmer of hope for the future generations (change- romanticism) Because of their union, the hatred between the two families in the past will fade with time. Their wedding day will be on New Years day – symbolising a new beginning.


  • It is vital to take notice of how far Heathcliff will go to achieve his aims. He is like Frankenstein in his obsessions and how he acts upon them so casually when they are horrifying to any outside pair of eyes.
  • There are constant references to the grim weather patterns on the moors, they are dark, brooding and stormy. – Much like the darkness and violence of the events at the heights.
  • Heathcliff is constantly violent towards Linton and Cathy, he is clearly still head over heels in love with Catherine. Closely examine how he snatches the locket from Cathy’s neck and grinds the picture of Edgar beneath his foot. Perhaps he despises her not just because she is the daughter of Edgar, but because she’s the daughter that should have been his.
  • Although Linton has perhaps inherited some viciousness from his father, he cannot and would not follow it through as he shows such horror at the atrocities of his father:

‘I wink to see my father stroke a dog or horse, he does it so hard‘ – There’s such innocence in this extract.

  • During Edgar’s funeral Heathcliff opens Catherine’s coffin again just to be close to her, but of course even by committing such a vile act like digging up a corpse, Heathcliff can never be close to her again in the living world. It’s killing him:

‘It was a strange way of killing… through eighteen years!’

  • Heathcliff is said to have been seen wandering the moors, perhaps he never actually got the peace he sought.
  • Lockwood’s final description of the three graves is in itself incredibly disturbing.

Narrative Structure:

In the 19th Century both first person and omniscient narrators were very popular in writing. Bronte managed to make her writing unique in the way in which she used multiple narrators.

Lockwood does not understand the situation on the moors and so he is treated like the reader, everything is explained to him. More than just that though, Lockwood represents an average human mind, an outside perspective who is just as shocked and foreign as we are to the events and emotions at Wuthering Heights.

Nelly’s roles as a narrators is also vital. She is another ‘normal’ person who acts as a counterweight of control and stability to the madness. As a housekeeper at both Wuthering Heights and Thrushcross Grange at different stages she is both informed and able to give a reliable insight. She is able to see both the good and bad in Heathcliff and Catherine.

-At the same time it’s difficult to see how reliable she is, she deceives Edgar about Heathcliff and Catherine, as we are hearing so much about the events from her, how can we not be sure that she is hiding truths.

The story is also told through flashbacks, not necessarily one long chronological order of how it happened. This only emphasises the sense of instability in Wuthering Heights, much like the emotions and the relationships of the main characters.

The story is split into clear sections:

  • Introduction: Heathcliff is brought into the Earnshaw family
  • Development: Relationships become more complex (Heathcliff with Catherine and Hindley)
  • Climax: Catherine’s death
  • Denouement: Heathcliff’s revenge on the Linton family
  • Conclusion: Heathcliff has passed away and peace is finally being restored to the moors.

The structure of Wuthering Heights is much like a tragedy (Macbeth for instance).

The Setting:

The moorlands of Yorkshire are vital to the premise of the story. The elements are presented so powerfully (representing the extreme emotion) that they surround the two estates giving a feeling of imprisonment and claustrophobia. This sense of such a small community trapped with each other reminds us that these characters have no one else to socialise with.

Lord David Cecil claims that Wuthering Heights is a war between calm and storm. This is exemplified by two properties of the novel. Wuthering Heights represents the storm, it’s remote, exposed to the powerful elements and there is a sense of the primitive among the people living there.

The clear damage to the house is from how the powerful weather has battered it, yet it still stands as the trees surround are stunted in their growth, so are the people who are raised there.

Juxtaposing this we have Thrushcross Grange, a pleasant cottage in a pleasant valley, shielded from the elements.

Wuthering Heights appears to be Heathcliff’s natural environment, he has an admirable connection with nature that fits him to the Heights. When he leaves he comes back a destructive and revenge obsessed individual. The same connection between Wuthering Heights and Catherine can be made, Thrushcross Grange calms her and settles her, but when her true self is revealed in her delirium she is like a wild animal, she needs that harsh dose of nature from the Heights:

‘That heaven did not seem to be my home’ – Her heaven is the ‘Misanthrop‘s heaven’ or perhaps there is no heaven for her reinforced by ‘I’ve been a waif for twenty years.’

Again, the two are clearly at the happiest point in their lives when they are children, running free across the moors, uncultured and free, free from the rules and expectations of society. (This is applicable to both the themes of Nature vs. Nurture and a noble savage.) As there are rumours of ghosts on the moors and Wuthering Heights is finally closed at the end of the novel, we get the feeling that somewhere beyond the two are finally living like they should have.

The Characters:

Towards the end of the novel there is a sense that Catherine has killed herself, not explicitly but because she has given up on life. Bare in mind how sinful suicide is to the church which was widely accepted and respected in the 19th Century.

Catherine doesn’t exactly conform to Gothic stereotypes in that she is in no way a damsel, nor is she exactly femme-fatale. Although, she is incredibly wild and manipulative like one would expect a femme-fatale to be. At the same time she is not exactly the personification of evil like Lady Macbeth, she is more complex and human than most Gothic female characters.

Heathcliff is powerful, passionate and highly influential, he’s also incredibly cruel and unempathic. There are many descriptions of him connecting him with great evil and Satan himself. Again though, the issues is how much of this evil inside him has been brought about by his circumstances. Like Frankenstein’s creature he started out innocent and free, but bit by bit the evils of the world pick away at him moulding him into a dark and vengeful individual. HE even tries to change himself as a child:

Nelly, make me decent, I’m going to be good.’- There’s a sense of desperation in his tone, to escape from who he is.

Some critics suggest that Heathcliff is a ‘Byronic hero‘, like Byron he causes ‘scandal and thrill in equal measures’. He is ‘mad, bad and dangerous to know‘. Stereotypically, a Byronic hero is dark mysterious and brooding, haunted over a previous trauma.

-This trauma defines Heathcliff, it is what drives him on. His sole purpose in life has become revenge. Again, he is disregarding social expectations in order to fulfil his own personal desires. Acting in a cruel and calculating manner in which he works over a long period of time in order to destroy Hindley and the Lintons, even going as far as to manipulate and use Isabella for that very same purpose, exiling her from her own family in the process.

This lust for revenge in Heathcliff is his ‘tragic flaw‘ like Frankenstein’s passion for science. Under further analysis though, they are very very different characters. Heathcliff never stops to feel sorry for himself and certainly doesn’t act the victim, neither does he worry or care about who he’s hurting. He never loses focus on his desire. You could say that Heathcliff upholds his dignity which Frankenstein does not.

Edgar and Isabella represent society, and it’s structure contrasting them greatly with the primitivism of Heathcliff and Catherine. Edgar is very likeable, although first seemingly weak and fragile, he shows a certain moral and mental strength in how he never stops caring for his wife no matter how unfair or difficult she acts.

Isabella on the other hand is somewhat of an ignorant little girl. She is drawn to Heathcliff’s dark and mysterious nature despite warnings from both Catherine and her brother. She finally displays strength and maturity towards the end as she manages to run away with her son. (contextually at the time this would’ve been nigh on impossible for a woman to do).

Years later Hareton and Cathy are repeating history as a relationship develops between them, many of their parents qualities can be seen in them. Hareton’s love for Cathy is like an evolution of the previous generation. It is controlled and devoting like Edgar’s yet fiery and passionate like Heathcliff’s. 


I Seriously get the feeling this Gothic stuff is too emotional for me -.-